Who Is Harry Knox?

Member of Obama’s Advisory Council On Faith-Based And Neighborhood Partnerships Has Repeatedly Attacked Catholics!

LAST APRIL, OBAMA APPOINTED HARRY KNOX TO WHITE HOUSE COUNCIL DEDICATED TO HELPING AMERICANS “NO MATTER THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS”

On April 6, 2009, President Obama Appointed Harry Knox To Be A Member Of His Advisory Council On Faith-Based And Neighborhood Partnerships. (The White House, “President Obama Announces Additional Members Of Advisory Council On Faith-Based And Neighborhood Partnerships,” Press Release, 4/6/09

Obama’s “White House Office Of Faith-Based And Neighborhood Partnerships Will Work On Behalf Of Americans Committed To Improving Their Communities, No Matter Their Religious Or Political Beliefs.” (The White House, “Obama Announces White House Office Of Faith-Based And Neighborhood Partnerships,” Press Release, 2/5/09)

BUT KNOX HAS REPEATEDLY ATTACKED THE CATHOLIC FAITH, DOCTRINE

Knox Says Pope Benedict XVI And Catholic Doctrine On Contraception Is “Hurting People In The Name Of Jesus.” “‘The Pope’s statement that condoms don’t help control the spread of HIV, but rather condoms increase infection rates, is hurting people in the name of Jesus,’ said Harry Knox, director of the Human Rights Campaign’s Religion & Faith Program.” (“Human Rights Campaign Responds To Pope Benedict’s Remarks That Condoms Increase HIV Infections,” HRC.org, 3/17/09)

During California Marriage Ballot Initiative Debate, Knox Called Knights Of Columbus “Foot Soldiers Of A Discredited Army Of Oppression.” “Harry Knox, the religion and faith program director for the Human Rights Campaign, said … ‘The Knights of Columbus … in this particular case … were foot soldiers of a discredited army of oppression,’ Knox told the B.A.R. , referring to its role in the Prop 8 campaign.” (Dan Aiello, “Catholic Bishops Revealed As Key In Marriage Battle,” The Bay Area Reporter, 03/19/09)

And Called Pope Benedict XVI And Catholic Bishops “Discredited Leaders.” “Knox noted that the Knights of Columbus ‘followed discredited leaders,’ including bishops and Pope Benedict XVI. ‘A pope who literally today said condoms don’t help in control of AIDS,’ Knox said Tuesday, shortly after the pope’s comments were released.” (Dan Aiello, “Catholic Bishops Revealed As Key In Marriage Battle,” The Bay Area Reporter, 03/19/09)

After Local Catholic Church In Wyoming Denied Communion To Gay Couple, Knox Attacked Church For Being “Immoral And Insulting To Jesus” And Committing “Spiritual And Emotional Violence.” “The couple, who were married in Canada, spoke out in opposition to a Wyoming bill that would deny the recognition of marriage rights for same-sex couples in the state. As a result, church officials said explicitly that the couple were denied communion due to their advocacy for marriage equality … [Knox said,] ‘In this holy Lenten season, it is immoral and insulting to Jesus to use the body and blood of Christ the reconciler as a weapon to silence free speech and demean the love of a committed, legally married couple. The Human Rights Campaign grieves with the couple, Leah Vader and Lynne Huskinson, over this act of spiritual and emotional violence perpetrated against them.’” (“Human Rights Campaign Responds To Catholic Church Barring Same-Sex Couple From Receiving ‘The Body Of Christ’” HRC.org 4/6/07)

DESPITE ATTACKS, OBAMA “COMFORTABLE” WITH KNOX AS FAITH-BASED ADVISOR

In Response To House GOP Leader John Boehner’s Call For Knox To Resign His Position, Obama’s Press Secretary Said “President Is Comfortable With The Makeup Of His Faith Advisory Council.” Q: “A couple weeks ago John Boehner… ask[ed] the President remove Harry Knox from the faith-based council for comments that he made about the Pope and the Catholic Church; he referred to the Pope as a discredited leader. Does the President disagree with those comments and is he planning any action on that?” GIBBS: “I haven’t seen that letter, but I think the President is comfortable with the makeup of his faith advisory council.”(Robert Gibbs, Press Briefing, The White House, 6/2/09)

Joe Bonamassa's New Album "Black Rock" Due Out March 23

Great review from Jon at GuitarNoize.com of Joe Bonamassa's new album, "Black Rock", due out March 23.  The album can be pre-ordered from Bonamassa's U.S. distributor, J and R Adventures.  Pre-orders will be shipped out two weeks prior to the release date.  RC Blog looking forward to the April 23 tour date in Washington, D.C. 

I think I said something similar last release, but I can’t believe Joe Bonamassa is only 32 and Black Rock is his 10th, yes you read that correctly, 10th solo album release. The album was recorded at Black Rock Studios, Santorini, Greece hence the album title. It has a few greek influences thrown in such as on the track "Bird On A Wire", one of the outstanding tracks on Black Rock, which has a Clarino I believe in the intro and it sounds like a Bazouki and maybe Mandolin in the background fused with drums that sound like John Bonham. This track is actually a cover of the Leonard Cohen track and yet again Joe Bonamassa shows his excellent arrangement skills by transforming not only this track but also Jeff Beck’s "Spanish Boots" and Otis Rush’s "Three Times A Fool".

One of the highlights on this album is Joe’s cover of Willie Nelson’s "Night Life" featuring the always incredible B.B. King, the man who recognised the talent of Joe at an early age. Joe and B.B.‘s playing compliment each other well, as do their vocals. I love hearing how different their styles of playing are, B.B. is tasteful and soulful and Joe has more of an aggressive attacking style with a smoking tone.

There are a couple of tracks on this album, "Three Times A Fool" and "Look Over Yonders Wall" that reminded me of Clapton, both in tone and playing. It is amazing what a Chameleon Joe is. Joe plays slide on a track called "When The Fire Hits The Sea" which at first I thought he sounded like Derek Trucks on then I realised, no he sounds like Joe Bonamassa with thick creamy tone and phrasing that draws on classic blues slide players mixed with modern influences.

I can’t review this album without making some Led Zeppelin references. There are a few tracks on this album that obviously draw inspiration from Led Zep and he even seems to replicate some Jimmy Page tones on certain tracks. The opener "Steal Your Heart Away" for instance, which is a cover of the Bobby Parker track, has a Jimmy Page kind of stomping rock riff and tone but then launches into a solo that would make Eric Johnson himself put his guitar down and weep. Also "Blue and Evil", another great track has with some breath-taking guitar playing and a riff that wouldn’t be out of place in Kashmir. I’m not saying that the album is ripping off Led Zeppelin I can just hear a lot of influence in Joe’s playing, tone and writing which not many people could achieve with such originality and style.

The Ballad of John Henry was quite an album to try and follow, Black Rock is a great album and an example of great songwriting, arrangements and of course guitar playing and tone. Joe experiments with guitar tone more than most which brings a nice quality to each track, you never tire of hearing that same sound although and yet it is always unmistakably Joe. Is this album better than The Ballad Of John Henry? Well it is difficult to compare because this album has a totally different feel to it. I love The Ballad Of John Henry, it was my favourite album of 2009 chock full of incredible covers and originals. Black Rock doesn’t quite have the same initial impact for me but grows on you with each listen and after 10 or so listens start to finish I can say that this is probably going to be one of the most played albums in my iTunes this year.

After being asked whether it is a heavy-blues album or a more melodic one such as the last one, the answer is a bit of both but it definitely has more of a rock vibe than the last album and has some great dirty heavy blues tracks such as "When The Fire Hits The Sea", "Three Times A Fool", and "Wandering Earth" (very “Since I’ve Been Loving You” - Zep). Also a folky old school acoustic blues style track called "Athens To Athens". But then it has moments of Rock Blues that will knock you off your feet.

Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli: Founders would cheer Virginia’s anti-Obamacare bill

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli continues to lead the charge against the mandatory imposition of ObamaCare on Virginians.  God bless him!  Recently, the RC Blog included Cuccinelli's appearance on Fox Business Network's "Cavuto Show" on this same issue.  He should stand as a shining example for all Attorneys General throughout the nation to have the courage to go after the Socialist tactic of mandatory health care for Americans.

Here is an Op-Ed in Wednesday's Washington Examiner from General Cuccinelli:

February 10, 2010 Virginia is moving towards passing legislation that would make it unlawful to implement federal legislation to compel Virginia residents to buy health insurance, a/k/a, Obamacare. On Monday, February 1st, the Democratic-controlled state senate of Virginia passed a bill that would block the implementation of the individual mandate of Obamacare.

Some have argued that, constitutionally, federal legislation compelling Virginians to buy health insurance is no different than any other economic regulation imposed by Congress. That kind of “that’s the way we’ve always done it” thinking is not only incorrect constitutionally, but may help explain why reckless spending at the federal level has pushed America to the verge of bankruptcy.

It reminds me of an exchange between a reporter and one of the several Democratic committee chairmen in the House that are addressing the health care bill: The reporter asked the chairman “where in the Constitution does it say the federal government can mandate citizens to buy health insurance?”

The chairman snapped back: “Where does it say we can’t?!”

Sadly, like many of his cohorts, this chairman was blissfully unaware that if the Constitution doesn’t say the federal government can do something, then it can’t do it. And nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government given the authority to mandate citizens to purchase anything.

The bigger-government approach to the healthcare issue is clear cause to reexamine some fundamentals of how our government should operate. Our system of government is a republic. Before the Revolution, the sovereign was England. Following the Revolution, the power of the sovereign devolved to the people of the states, as explicitly noted in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution itself.

The states, as sovereign entities, granted express and limited powers to the federal government by way of the United States Constitution. To prevent one branch of the federal government from exceeding its express and limited powers, we have a “horizontal” system of checks and balances – the three branches of the federal government.

However, we also have a “vertical” system of checks and balances between the states and the federal government. This vertical system of checks and balances has been used too infrequently, but Virginia is now using it to declare our own law regarding healthcare freedom as a means to counteract an unconstitutional law (if it passes) at the federal level. This would create a conflict of laws.

But as James Madison wrote in Federalist 51, freedom is best protected when political ambition counteracts political ambition. Virginia is protecting the freedom of its citizens by “checking” the federal leviathan on the matter of healthcare.

The courts would need to resolve the coming conflict. Ultimately, however, the voters will decide: do federal politicians who may vote for Obamacare stand with the people and the Constitution? Virginians are saying “no” on a bi-partisan basis.

Too many people in Washington forget they get their authority – and I’ll add, their only authority – by a grant of express and enumerated powers from the sovereign states. But also as Madison wrote, that power “should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people.”

Our Virginia legislation, however, is important for other reasons. It may prove to be a model for other states to combat the reckless, out-of-touch ways of Washington. It has long been apparent that people are frustrated with government, but many people didn’t think they could do something about controlling such a behemoth.

Now people are figuring out the way to stop abuses of power which seem to be crippling our economy and eating away our liberty, is by using the Constitution against those who violate it. Leadership in this approach must come from the states.

It is the states that were expected to control the federal government, that’s why Madison said that the “different governments will control each other” in Federalist 51. The “different governments” are the state and federal governments. It’s part of our constitutional role as a state.

As attorney general for Virginia, I’m with Madison. The people of Virginia have every reason to expect that when the government violates the law – especially the supreme law of the land, the Constitution – there will be someone to protect them every bit as much as they are protected against violations of law by ordinary criminals.

For too long, the federal government has operated as if it granted authority and freedoms to people and the states. It’s time to start returning this system to its proper balance. The system has broken down, and that has real consequences for jobs, the economy, our security and our freedom.

Virginia’s history is steeped in protecting liberty – the foundation of our nation’s greatness. Once again, Virginia is taking the lead in protecting our citizens’ sacred liberty.

RFK, Jr. 15 Months Ago: Global Warming Means No Snow or Cold in DC

Great piece from David Freddoso of the Washington Examiner:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C.

In Virginia, the weather also has changed dramatically. Recently arrived residents in the northern suburbs, accustomed to today's anemic winters, might find it astonishing to learn that there were once ski runs on Ballantrae Hill in McLean, with a rope tow and local ski club. Snow is so scarce today that most Virginia children probably don't own a sled. But neighbors came to our home at Hickory Hill nearly every winter weekend to ride saucers and Flexible Flyers.

In those days, I recall my uncle, President Kennedy, standing erect as he rode a toboggan in his top coat, never faltering until he slid into the boxwood at the bottom of the hill. Once, my father, Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, brought a delegation of visiting Eskimos home from the Justice Department for lunch at our house. They spent the afternoon building a great igloo in the deep snow in our backyard. My brothers and sisters played in the structure for several weeks before it began to melt. On weekend afternoons, we commonly joined hundreds of Georgetown residents for ice skating on Washington's C&O Canal, which these days rarely freezes enough to safely skate.

Meanwhile, Exxon Mobil and its carbon cronies continue to pour money into think tanks whose purpose is to deceive the American public into believing that global warming is a fantasy.

Having shoveled my walk five times in the midst of this past weekend's extreme cold and blizzard, I think perhaps RFK, Jr. should leave weather analysis to the meteorologists instead of trying to attribute every global phenomenon to anthropogenic climate change.

The Manhattan Declaration

Christians, when they have lived up to the highest ideals of their faith, have defended the weak and vulnerable and worked tirelessly to protect and strengthen vital institutions of civil society, beginning with the family. It was in this tradition that a group of prominent Christian clergy, ministry leaders, and scholars released the Manhattan Declaration on November 20, 2009 at a press conference in Washington, DC. The 4,700-word declaration speaks in defense of the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty. It issues a clarion call to Christians to adhere firmly to their convictions in these three areas.  To date, more than 400,000 people have signed the Declaration.
 
For more information on the Manhattan Declaration, click here.