tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post5200895617065804196..comments2023-10-24T03:40:33.146-04:00Comments on The Reagan Conservatives Blog: Sestak Scandal UpdateUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post-55801048558196624902010-06-01T10:18:29.081-04:002010-06-01T10:18:29.081-04:00Actually, the law makes no differentiation between...<i>Actually, the law makes no differentiation between unpaid and paid positions. It is against the law regardless...</i><br /><br />Then we'd better start rounding up all the living presidents, and teh CEO's from every company in America. They're all guilty, by your standard.<br /><br />And by the way, it's going to be hell to set up a White House administration from now on, since every job offer has to be looked on as "bribery"Nameless Cynichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17963921060024737712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post-53019235563306423422010-05-29T09:33:26.091-04:002010-05-29T09:33:26.091-04:00Actually, the law makes no differentiation between...Actually, the law makes no differentiation between unpaid and paid positions. It is against the law regardless...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post-31384339734198894052010-05-29T03:58:06.022-04:002010-05-29T03:58:06.022-04:00Really? Where's the scandal?
I mean, a bribe ...Really? Where's the scandal?<br /><br />I mean, a bribe normally consists of something of value being offered, right? As opposed to, say, an unpaid advisor position?<br /><br />And, incidentally, are you serious? You're going to come onto a blog calling itself "Reagan Conservatives" and say that Saint Ronnie committed a crime?<br /><br />Really?<br /><br />Calm down, take some deep breaths, and go have a drink with your birther buddies. Maybe they can convince you that you aren't delusional.Nameless Cynichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17963921060024737712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post-66996749847164351302010-05-29T02:24:41.093-04:002010-05-29T02:24:41.093-04:00If Reagan did this--then yes---he is guilty---wron...If Reagan did this--then yes---he is guilty---wrong is wrong--bringing up something that happened 28 years ago--doesn't make what took place in the current administration right. So unbunch your panties and realize it wasn't an invented scandal---it is a scandal. Period.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454990811517960710.post-62471588758716039582010-05-28T19:53:27.054-04:002010-05-28T19:53:27.054-04:00Where's the scandal? No-pay for no-play? How a...Where's the scandal? No-pay for no-play? How are you going to make that into a bribe?<br /><br />Can I point out that in 1982 President Reagan offered Senator S.I. Hayakawa an <i>actual</i> job if he dropped out of the California GOP primary? Are you saying Reagan was guilty of bribery?<br /><br />This is all just standard politics. Unbunch your panties - there's no scandal that you don't invent yourself.Nameless Cynichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17963921060024737712noreply@blogger.com